Two systems that do not talk, and a person in the middle.
Most integration problems are not integration problems. They are disagreements about who owns which field — and code cannot settle those.
Does this sound familiar?
- Every morning someone exports from one system and imports into another.
- The same customer exists twice, spelled two different ways.
- When the integration fails, you hear it from a client, not from a monitor.
- Two reports on the same number disagree, and nobody can say which is right.
- The ERP was supposed to be the single source of truth. It is not.
How we approach it
01 — Inventory
Find every real source
There are always more than anyone lists — a database nobody mentioned, a file dropped on a share, a report someone emails. We find them before designing anything.
02 — Ownership
Decide who owns each field
One system is right about the customer address; another is right about the price. Writing that down resolves most conflicts before a line of code exists.
03 — Build
Pipelines that fail loudly
Retry, idempotency, and a record of exactly what moved and when. Silent partial failure is the expensive kind.
04 — Watch
Monitoring, so you know first
An alert when a load does not arrive, and reconciliation that proves both sides still agree.
What you get
- An inventory of every source that actually feeds the process.
- An ownership map — which system is authoritative for which field.
- Pipelines in production, with retry and full traceability.
- Alerting on failed and missing loads.
- Reconciliation reports that prove the two sides agree.
Technologies
Mastercard
End-to-end integration structures engineered from strategy through execution, on a platform that could not stop.
Read the case →Tell us what you are trying to fix.
A tangled integration, a slow database, a system nobody understands any more. The first conversation is 30 minutes and costs nothing.